I ain't got no money!!! I can't express just how broke I am right now, and GW isn't helping that cause.
The irony in this likely-copyrighted image... |
There's two reasons that I'm suddenly writing this post- the first is about how much the Space Marine redo seems to have people in a tissy. This includes me since I can't afford $70 just to get the rules and another $15 for the cards. I haven't even had the means to pick up the Shadowspear box and I really wanted that. But my tissy isn't the same as everyone else's. I'll get to that.
The other reason is how me and my son are playing and, rather that taking pics and videos, I'm taking the time to teach him the 'strategy' of the game. While it's nice to win against him using rather weak armies, it will be much nicer to have that urge to adjust my army lists to try and overcome the onset of a losing streak. To use that awesome analogy that every father knows- I don't mind beating my son at basketball until he grows tall enough to block my shots. Then I mind it quite a bit.
In our most recent game, it ended after two turns and I won 10-7 using ITC rules. But he learned quite a bit. We talked about how I make him react to my army and that automatically leads to a win for me. We discussed how scoring points should always be the focus rather than trying to kill what he perceives as the biggest threats. In the case of my Chaos Marines versus his Dark Angels, he falls for the Helldrake rush every time and that gives my recyclable marines and shredder-style Possessed all the time they need to move up and wipe him out. When it's not about slaughtering, the game is actually a blast!
Which brings me to my first point- we're still using the older books for our armies. Obviously, we use the FAQs to include the bonus attacks for our forces and updated rules and points, but I don't have the ability to use the Ultramarines in their newer, bluer glory. And with how our games currently go, I don't think that the game would be fun as my armies would crush him even faster. And who wants to play a game where setup takes longer than losing?
While I'm voluntarily (sorta) choosing to play the 1.0 codex rules (or 1.5 if you count the big FAQ stuff in there), it seems that the gamers on the internet that have the 2.0 codex are still complaining incessantly. Either Space Marines are too powerful (like having a jump captain with 12 attacks at S6 causing multiple damage each wound roll) or they are still not good (like Bobby G getting a fair taste of the nerf-bat). And this got me to wondering who these people are playing against to take this stuff so seriously.
Wait, I'm less powerful now? Ooookaaayy.... |
No really- why? |
Many of the whingers that I read online (the internet- the place for whining anonymously!) seem to believe that 5th edition 40k is better. The "rules were tighter" or "there was less rules bloat". Those that remember 3rd and 4th editions fondly seem to have similar mentalities. Worse, they go on the various blog-sites and wax authoritatively about how GW has no idea how to write rules and the new versions of the game and its armies are absolutely terrible, telling young little Timmies how 'their day' was better for the game. I couldn't disagree more, simply because the solution is easy-
Just go play those old editions already!
After all, any gamer worth their salt has bookshelves and long-boxes full of old rules sets that they've played in the past. Why not just bust that old stuff out and use it? If I wanted to play original Necromunda because the new version is terrible (it's not), I have it all and could do so. I'd rather do that than go online and ruin other peoples' gaming experience based on my... what's that word? Oh yeah- opinion! I know that my son has played the last three editions of 40k and he loves this edition the best. And you know what?
I love this edition as well! I loved 2nd edition when my boyz-in-blue could punch Leman Russes to death. I loved 3rd edition with those boyz-in-blue were the worst army in their own book. I loved 4th edition when my boyz-in-blue could arm themselves with chainswords and extra special weapons. I loved 5th edition when I finally figured out that lightning-claw armed captains could wreck those cursed gray armies. I loved 6th edition when those boyz-in-blue finally got their due and were no longer the worst army in their own book. I loved 7th edition because I owned every formation you could think of (did I mention that I had an addiction?). And now I love this edition because my boyz-in-blue are actually the poster-child in rules and imagery. At the end of the day, I feel bad for those complainers with funny handles, because it turns out that I just love this game!
Let me know how you feel in the comments below (and please comment, my page is bare enough!). If you disagree, please give me a more unique argument. If you agree with me, share some stories of some of the best whining you've heard recently. Most importantly, pull out some gaming stuff and enjoy.
Happy gaming!
Love your post, though haven't played the game since 1989(?)(Holy crap!). I hear they released a new edition of the the rules...
ReplyDeleteHope your broke problem goes away soon.
Thanks, Irishserb! There's been a couple two or three editions released since those days long ago. :-)
DeleteI'm sure GW hopes my broke problem goes away as well. Luckily, I have too many games anyway. But I definitely still dig this one (as does my son!).